garmo labs
Workspace
Ip›IP-3632
Security & cryptography

KOURAN Continuation Token Execution Model

Execution is driven by continuation tokens rather than SKYRA hyperblocks; a continuation becomes eligible when dependency tokens, authority state and expected object version satisfy the architectural contract.

Source / reference evidence
Request evaluation
KOUSecurity & cryptography
THE TECHNICAL ROLE

A clear integration boundary.

KOURAN Continuation Token Execution Model provides the documented execution architecture responsibility: Execution is driven by continuation tokens rather than SKYRA hyperblocks; a continuation becomes eligible when dependency tokens, authority state and expected object version satisfy the architectural contract. Evaluate the exact KOURAN-IP-002 implementation and confirm its integration contract before using it inside the target design.

01

Execution is driven by continuation tokens rather than SKYRA hyperblocks

02

a continuation becomes eligible when dependency tokens, authority state and expected object version satisfy the architectural contract

TECHNICAL OVERVIEW

The details matter.

Download the product brief
Canonical identity
IP-3632
Native implementation identity
KOURAN-IP-002
Documented responsibility
Execution is driven by continuation tokens rather than SKYRA hyperblocks; a continuation becomes eligible when dependency tokens, authority state and expected object version satisfy the architectural contract.
Recorded evidence class
Source / reference evidence
Interface and physical parameters
Bound to the selected source/configuration; not inferred from name or family.
Source / reference evidence

Know the release.
Know what it establishes.

Architecture docs + continuation queue/token-table RTL + compiler token-format source.

Source basis: Bible v7.42 VERIFIED V29, IP-3632; 95.3 New canonical KOURAN records - 41 net-new identities (table 788, row 3).. This is a controlled-portfolio summary, not a fresh execution of the chip qualification flow.

Explore the evidence centerQualification record

Release-specific qualification

Evidence shown is the Bible record for this canonical implementation, not a fresh tool rerun. External foundry acceptance, silicon measurements, standards certification and unlisted interface/physical parameters are not inferred. Exact delivery and rights are agreed before licensing.

Canonical record: P1 / IMPLEMENTATION-BACKED ARCHITECTURE; FULL ELIGIBILITY GATE NOT YET INTEGRATED

A PATH THAT FITS THE PROJECT

Build with KOURAN Continuation Token Execution Model.

Technical scope, rights, support and release configuration are agreed before delivery.

evaluation

Review the exact recorded implementation and agreed test scope

Inspect the named release and establish technical fit.

Discuss this scope
production

Named-design rights for the agreed qualified release

Agree deployment or design rights, deliverables and support.

Discuss this scope
custom

Target integration, verification or physical qualification

Define the customer-specific work and acceptance criteria.

Discuss this scope

Keep exploring.

Security & cryptography

Chiplet Admission Firewall

Chiplet admission, quarantine and trust-boundary engine

Executed digital evidence
IP-2014 · Executed digital evidence

Your next big idea.
Let’s build it together.

Start with a chip, a software release or a single IP block.

Talk to GarmoStart exploring
CANONICAL EVIDENCE RECORD · IP-3632

Source / reference evidence

Source and/or executable reference evidence is recorded. This does not establish HDL or physical qualification unless separately stated.

Source: Bible 7.42 VERIFIED V29 · 95.3 New canonical KOURAN records - 41 net-new identities · table 788, row 3.

Record integrity and qualification boundary

a87d7f18ddddf7636f4a39f2d8366eaab60b9131c02f29d6bcfe5275da45df73

Evidence ranking for evaluation prioritization; not a probability or certification.

How evidence priority is determined ↗